Repository navigation
multiprocessing calls flush on sys.stdout at exit even if it is None (pythonw) #75985
Description
Activity
poxthegreat commented
on Oct 17, 2017 poxthegreatmannequinMannequinAuthorMore actionsIf you start Python by pythonw then sys.stdout and sys.stderr are set to None. If you also use multiprocessing then when the child process finishes BaseProcess._bootstrap calls sys.stdout.flush() and sys.stderr.flush() finally. This causes the process return code to be not zero (it is 1).
- addedtype-crashA hard crash of the interpreter, possibly with a core dumpA hard crash of the interpreter, possibly with a core dumpstdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directoryStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directory
on Oct 17, 2017 This looks to be a duplicate of https://bugs.python.org/issue28326
Unfortunately this is NOT a duplicate of https://bugs.python.org/issue28326. That issue is about a closed output stream. In that case sys.stdout and sys.stderr are file like objects which have been closed.
This issue is about sys.stdout and sys.stderr being None! This is because pythonw was used not python.
Pox, please retest with either 3.6.4 or 3.7.0a3 (or .0a4 when released, soon). Both were released after the merge that should fix this.
poxthegreat commented
on Jan 10, 2018 poxthegreatmannequinMannequinAuthorMore actionsRetested it with a freshly installed 3.6.4 version. Used the following code to test:
import sys import multiprocessing def foo(): return 'bar' if __name__ == '__main__': proc = multiprocessing.Process(target=foo) proc.start() proc.join() with open('process_exit_code.txt', 'w') as f: f.write(sys.version) f.write('\nprocess exit code: ') f.write(str(proc.exitcode))
It is very important to run the script with pythonw, not just with python. This is the content of the resulting process_exit_code.txt file on my machine:
3.6.4 (v3.6.4:d48eceb, Dec 19 2017, 06:04:45) [MSC v.1900 32 bit (Intel)]
process exit code: 1As it can be seen the problem was not fixed. The process exit code should be 0. By default the new multiprocessing process created uses the same interpreter as the creator process, so it uses pythonw too.
I'm not using Windows, so I'm unable to test using pythonw. You'll have to provide a fix, or someone else will have to.
poxthegreat commented
on Jan 12, 2018 poxthegreatmannequinMannequinAuthorMore actionsI have already uploaded a patch file but it is not in the required format. Also I realize that most of the confusion was because I forgot to provide the OS version. Perhaps it would be good to have a separate field for that.
I will upload a patch as it is described in the developer guide.
- addedtype-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or errorAn unexpected behavior, bug, or errorand removedtype-crashA hard crash of the interpreter, possibly with a core dumpA hard crash of the interpreter, possibly with a core dump
on Jan 12, 2018 This is all fixed in the Python 3 branches now. I won't bother with Python 2 as it has quite a different code structure and backporting would take too much of my time.
Pox TheGreat, thanks for reporting and the initial patch!
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
bugs.python.org fields: