Repository navigation
Zlib inflate() holds and reuses buffer until program exit, is never freed limiting memory for other uses. #45303
Description
Activity
- addedzlibIssues and PRs related to the zlib module and its compression dependencies.Issues and PRs related to the zlib module and its compression dependencies.
on Nov 3, 2022 Is your complaint that the memory from this line isn't released until exit?
const compressed = compressBuffer(1000 * MEGABYTES);
If so, I don't understand why you expect it to be released earlier.
To follow
Hi @Neustradamus, did you consider clicking on the
subscribebutton instead? That would allow you to follow the conversation without having to write a comment that unfortunately sends unnecessary notifications to everyone who is subscribed.I'll close this out seeing there's been no response from OP.
I was out on vacation and then EOY celebrations. Please re-open.
Is your complaint that the memory from this line isn't released until exit?
const compressed = compressBuffer(1000 * MEGABYTES);
If so, I don't understand why you expect it to be released earlier.
The decompression buffer is never released until process exit, a 1000MB buffer.
The compressed buffer is just 3 megabytes and never released, that's correct but not the issue.Not sure I follow. That buffer is 1,000 MB, not 3 MB big - edit: oh wait, you're saying it's 3 MB after compression, right?
In the "expected behavior" section, you fill out what you expect but not why. Can you elaborate on that?
I agree the syntax is confusing for
compressBuffer. (I'll elaborate on why below after some context.)The compressBuffer function:
- creates a 1000MB random fill buffer
- then compresses it to around 3MB
- then releases the 1000MB correctly (as seen in the mem usage log)
compress { fill input.... GC CALL/EXT MEM= 1000.3MB deflated...... GC CALL/EXT MEM= 1003.3MB freed input... GC CALL/EXT MEM= 3.3MB } compressYou can see the only memory left in use is 3MB (from the compressed buffer, again, correct)
But then after decompressing from 3MB back to 1000MB, I can never free that buffer back, ever.If the original buffer were to be bigger, then the decompressed buffer that can't be freed is bigger.
Luckily that buffer seems to be re-used by zlib on each call, so it's not a cumulative memory leak.To answer the why: If I want to use that memory for something else after some processing (in my case big PNG inflate and decode) I no longer have that memory available, it's bound to zlib.
before decompress GC CALL/EXT MEM= 3.3MB decompress { after inflate... GC CALL/EXT MEM= 2003.4MB after promise. GC CALL/EXT MEM= 2003.4MB free output... GC CALL/EXT MEM= 1003.4MB <--------- this internal buffer is never released } decompress after decompress GC CALL/EXT MEM= 1003.4MBI understand decompression takes 2000MB because it needs 1000MB for the chunks list, and then another contiguous 1000MB to unify the chunks from the list after it's done decompressing. But then one of those two is greedily kept by zlib (to be reused later, apparently) but can never be released for other uses.
(Updated previous comment with log references for clarity)
Not sure I follow. That buffer is 1,000 MB, not 3 MB big - edit: oh wait, you're saying it's 3 MB after compression, right?
Yes
In the "expected behavior" section, you fill out what you expect but not why. Can you elaborate on that?
To further elaborate with a concrete example:
I'm constrained by memory limited containers 8GB.
Sometimes I need to serially decompress BIG PNGs to, let's say, a 7.5GB uncompressed buffer each, to recompress them into a different format.
But even after disposing their buffers, I will not be able to do something different afterwards, unrelated to de/compression, on the remaining 0.5GB free limited memory and the container will crash due to OOM, even though those 7.5GB should be available, but are held hostage by zlib for unknown reasons.Please don't forget to re-open! Happy new year!
@addaleax I think this may be a misreporting bug introduced in (speculatively) ed715ef rather than a real memory leak.
AllocScopelooks like it can miss updates when its destructor races with a zlib job thread and indeed reported external memory stays constant when I changeinflate()toinflateSync().Thank you.
I don't think it's only a reporting problem. As stated by the second log of the original post, If I soft limit the memory (using
ulimit) it runs OOM and is killed while manually creating a buffer, as expected when OOM (RangeError: Array buffer allocation failed). If it was just an accounting error it shouldn't.@bnoordhuis I don’t think this is an accounting error either. By
printf()ing out the values passed toIsolate::AdjustAmountOfExternalAllocatedMemory()from zlib it seems that they are balanced and sum up to zero as they should.Inserting a
printf()probably perturbs timings enough that any race conditions go away. I won't claim there's definitely a race going on but the wayAllocScopeis used now doesn't look Obviously Correct to me.(And since
inflateSyncmakes the problem go away it's almost certainly some thread-related issue.)I have just noticed what looks like the same issue/behavior, but with async zstdDecmpress. Switching to sync releases all the memory correctly.
github-actions commented
on Jul 20, 2026 on Jul 20, 2026 – with GitHub ActionsContributorMore actionsThis issue has been marked as stale due to 90 days of inactivity.
It will be automatically closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. If this is still relevant, please leave a comment or update it to keep it open.- addedstaleIssues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure.Issues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure.
on Jul 20, 2026 github-actions commented
on Aug 20, 2026 on Aug 20, 2026 – with GitHub ActionsContributorMore actionsThis issue has been automatically closed after 30 days of inactivity following its stale status (no activity for a total of 120 days).
If this is still relevant, feel free to reopen it or leave a comment with additional details so we can continue the discussion.
Version
v16.17.1
Platform
Linux 5.15.0-52-generic #58~20.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Oct 13 13:09:46 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Subsystem
zlib
What steps will reproduce the bug?
Code snippet (run with
--expose-gc)How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?
Always
What is the expected behavior?
Memory should lower back to near zero after finishing each decompression routine/scope.
What do you see instead?
Memory never lowers back to "zero" until the exit handler, not allowing it's reuse for something else.
It's not a cumulative memory leak, but keeps it reserved forever.
In a system with 2.5 GB memory limit it would crash due to OOM, even if we could fit 2GB easily if that memory held by zlib was released. Try it:
(ulimit -Sd 2500000; node --expose-gc ./script.js )Script output unbounded
$ node --expose-gc script.jsScript output boudned to 2500 MB (in Ubuntu, YMMV)
( ulimit -Sd 2500000 ; node --expose-gc script.js )Additional information
This was a related issue I previously raised and closed myself because it wasn't a leak and I was misguided by understanding how zlib worked #44750
But even now understanding the peak memory use would be 2x the inflated buffer (the chunks must be unified in another buffer) it still doesn't explain why it is not released.
I thought to open a new issue because the original title would be misleading. It's not a memory leak per se as it doesn't accumulate, but it nevers releases those buffers that might be needed by other parts of the program.