Skip to content

Access for @miladfarca to IBM machines #1706

Description

@mhdawson

@miladfarca is going to be helping more with the IBM platforms and we've asked a few times for access already and gotten approval. See: #1702 and #1686.

I'd like him to help setup the new machines outlined in: #1705 so I'd like the ok to give him access to those machines as well. We are also working to get an additional set of s390 machines with a newer os as well so I'll ask in advance if we can get the ok to give him access to those as well.

Of note, @gdams has left IBM so getting @miladfarca access will help me move these efforts along.

Activity

  1. refack commented on Feb 26, 2019

    @refack
    Contributor

    👍
    To be explicit, I suggest we make this permanent access.

  2. mhdawson commented on Feb 27, 2019

    @mhdawson
    MemberAuthor

    @nodejs/build would be good if a few more build wg members chimed in on @refack's suggestion.

  3. Trott commented on Feb 27, 2019

    @Trott
    Member

    +1

  4. gdams commented on Feb 27, 2019

    @gdams
    Member

    +1

  5. mhdawson commented on Mar 18, 2019

    @mhdawson
    MemberAuthor

    Going to move forward with adding Milad's keys

  6. Trott commented on Aug 19, 2019

    @Trott
    Member

    @mhdawson Since this is a permanent access grant, this can be closed, no?

  7. mhdawson commented on Aug 20, 2019

    @mhdawson
    MemberAuthor

    I'm ok with closing it if that is what people think is best. Even closed it is a record of the ok to give him access, maybe just a bit harder to find since you need to look for closed issues. Normally I'd expect people look at the open issues since that is what we use for temporary access.

  8. sam-github commented on Sep 4, 2019

    @sam-github
    Contributor

    I like to keep these open as a reminder to clean up the keys eventually.

  9. github-actions commented on Jul 8, 2021

    @github-actions

    This issue is stale because it has been open many days with no activity. It will be closed soon unless the stale label is removed or a comment is made.

  10. mhdawson commented on Jul 8, 2021

    @mhdawson
    MemberAuthor

    @nodejs/build Since it is permanent access any objections to closing this issue?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions