Skip to content

docs(sourcey): add documentation generator - #1061

Open
auscaster wants to merge 3 commits into
jamstack:mainfrom
auscaster:add-sourcey
Open

auscaster wants to merge 3 commits into
jamstack:mainfrom
auscaster:add-sourcey

Conversation

@auscaster

@auscaster auscaster commented Mar 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Adds the current Sourcey documentation engine to the generator catalog. It is an AGPL-3.0-only TypeScript project that builds static HTML from OpenAPI, MCP, Doxygen, godoc, rustdoc, and Markdown sources.

Product page: https://sourcey.com/docs
Repository: https://github.com/sourcey/sourcey

@netlify

netlify Bot commented Mar 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Deploy Preview for jamstack-site ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit dcc8d40
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/jamstack-site/deploys/6ac30bccf8213b0008832df3
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1061--jamstack-site.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
🤖 Make changes Run an agent on this branch

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@matbrgz

matbrgz commented Oct 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Heads-up: there are now four open PRs adding the same src/site/generators/sourcey.md: this one, #1089, #1096 and #1097. Only one can be merged. This PR is the earliest and comes from the project's maintainer. #1089 has the most complete and current description (OpenAPI, MCP, Doxygen, godoc, rustdoc, MkDocs, static output).

If this PR is the one kept, a few fixes:

  • templates: TypeScript isn't a template language. Markdown (and MDX if supported) fits better.
  • language: the repo is TypeScript, not JavaScript.
  • The description could cover the newer inputs (MCP, Doxygen, godoc, rustdoc) that the other PRs mention.

@auscaster auscaster changed the title Add Sourcey docs(sourcey): add documentation generator Oct 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants