Skip to content

Three doc Question? #8091

Description

@xuanyuanaosheng
ISSUE TYPE
  • Documentation Report
  • Other
COMPONENT NAME
  • Cloudsatck Baremetal Management
  • CloudStack Kubernetes Service
CLOUDSTACK VERSION
  • CloudStack 4.18.0.0
  1. Does CloudStack Baremetal can only work in basic networking mode currently? (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Baremetal+Advanced+Networking+Support)

image

  1. Is there any doc about how to use cloudstack to manager the Baremetal servers? I can not find the useful info in the official doc. I only find: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Baremetal+KickStart

  2. As http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/plugins/cloudstack-kubernetes-service.html#kubernetes-clusters mentioned, (With CoreOS having reached EOL, from 4.16 the Kubernetes Service Plugin will use the existing SystemVM template for deploying kubernetes clusters. ), does the cloudstack can deploy kubernetes clusters using self defined template? If supported, How to build a self defined template?

@weizhouapache @shwstpp @malcolmtaylor

Activity

  1. changed the title [-]Two doc Question?[/-] [+]Three doc Question?[/+] on Oct 20, 2023
  2. shwstppr commented on Oct 20, 2023

    @shwstppr
    Contributor

    @xuanyuanaosheng I cannot comment on Baremetal support as I've not tried it myself or seen it working. I don't think the plugin is well maintained in the recent release and things may not work as expected there.

    Regarding CKS template, no currently it only uses systemvm template and self defined templates cannot be used. if you really need to use a custom template you may create a new systemvm template with the desired changes (but it still should be usable for other purpose - VR, system VMs) and follow steps to use that as systemvm template for your env.

  3. xuanyuanaosheng commented on Oct 20, 2023

    @xuanyuanaosheng
    Author

    @shwstppr Thanks for you reply. I will keep eye on these issues.

  4. added this to the unplanned milestone on Jan 12, 2024
  5. github-actions commented on Jan 5, 2026

    @github-actions

    This issue is stale because it has been open for 120 days with no activity. It may be removed by administrators of this project at any time. Remove the stale label or comment to request for removal of it to prevent this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions